Brown v. State, 647 So. 2d 333

ON CONFESSION OF ERROR

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from the resentencing which followed our decision in Brown v. State, 617 So.2d 1171 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993). Because the offenses in question were committed during the same criminal transaction, it was error to impose consecutive rather than concurrent habitual offender sentences. Hale v. State, 630 So.2d 521 (Fla. 1993), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 115 S.Ct. 278, 130 L.Ed.2d 195 (1994). The cause is remanded for correction of the sentences accordingly. The defendant need not be present.

Case Details

Case Name: Brown v. State

Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida

Date Published: Dec 28, 1994

Citations: 647 So. 2d 333; 1994 WL 715207; 94-2067

Docket Number: 94-2067

Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.