Brown v. Republican County Ex. Committee, 119 Ky. 720

Brown v. Republican County Ex. Committee

119 Ky. 720 | Ky. Ct. App. | 1902

Opinion of the court by

JUDGE BURNAM

Reversing.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the chancery division of the Jefferson Circuit Court sustaining a demurrer to a petition filed by appellant and dismissing the petition, in which he sought to restrain the Republican county executive *721committee for the county of Jefferson and the city of Louisville from holding a primary election on the 16th of July, 190ÍL, called for the purpose of nominating candidates for the various county and city offices which were to be filled at the regular November election, 1901. Appellant alleged that he was a candidate for the Republication nomination for judge of the Jefferson County Court; that he was a member of the Republican party, and eligible for its nomination for judge; that he had paid to the treasurer of the committee $50, assessed upon each person who desired to be a candidate at the primary election as his proportion of the expense of such primary; that subsequent to the payment of the assessment so levied the committee called a primary election to be held under certain rules and regulations, which were prescribed by the committee, which were essentially different from the requirements of article 12, chapter 41, off the Kentucky Statutes; and'that, unless the statutory method of conducting the primary was observed, the parties nominated in that primary could not require the county clerk to have printed on the official ballots their names as the candidates of the Republican party, as required by section 1453 of the election law. The question, therefore, to be determined upon this appeal is whether the provisions of article 12 of chapter 41 are mandatory when primary elections are resorted to as the method of selecting their candidates by a political party easting 2 per cent, of the total vote of the State at the last preceding general election. Article 12 of the chapter on elections is devoted exclusively to the subject of primary election. Section 1550, which is the first section of the article, defines a primary election within the meaning of the article and as used in the chapter as “an election held within the State, county, district or subdivision thereof, as the case may *722be, by the members of any political party or by the voters of some political faith for the purpose of nominating candidates for offices.” Section 1552 prescribes the penalties for violating its provisions; section 1553 the manner in which the governing authority of any political party desiring to hold a primary election under the provisions of the article may do so. Sections 1554-1559 prescribe the qualifications of persons entitled to vote at such primary elections; and the manner of ascertaining and determining whether the applicant is possessed of the requisite qualifications; section 1560 provides for the appointment of election officers, with their powers and duties; section 1561, how a person desiring to submit his name to the voters in a primary election may do so; section 1562, how the return of such election shall be made, and the penalty for any alterations thereof; section 1563, for.the counting of the vote; section 1564, for the payment of the necessary expense of holding such elections; etc.; and section 1565, the closing section of the article, provides: “The provisions of this article shall apply to' all primary elections held for the purpose of nominating candidates for State, county, district or municipal offices, hereafter held in .this Commonwealth, except those held in the year 1892.” It will be observed that the article prescribes a complete system of positive law for the selection of its candidates' by a. political party. There is nothing in the statute which requires a party to resort to the system therein prescribed as the method of selecting candidates, but we think there can be no doubt that it was the intention of the General Assembly that when this method was resorted tO' it should be conducted under and in accordance with the requirements of the statute. The adoption of the secret ballot was a radical departure from the previous methods of voting which had obtained in this State, and under this system it is of supreme *723importance that the names of the candidates of a political party should be placed upon the official ballot under the device of the party. And section 1453 of the statutes provides that: “The county clerk of each county shall cause to be printed on the respective ballots the names of the candidates nominated by the convention or primary election, of any party that cast two per cent, of the total vote of the State .at the last preceding general election, as certified to said clerk by the presiding officer and secretary of such convention, or in case of a primary election by the chairman and Secretary of any county or district committee, and also the names of any candidate for any office when petitioned to do so by the electors qualified to vote for candidates as follows: . . So far as we are advised, this State is the only one which has attempted by law to regulate the manner of conducting primary elections held for the purpose of selecting the candidates of a party, but we know of no restriction upon the power of the general assembly to prescribe the terms of holding such primary when they shall so elect. We are therefore of the opinion that when a- political party resorts to the primary as a method of selecting their candidates whose names are to go upon the official ballot under the device of the party, sucn primary must be conducted in accordance .with the requirements of article 12 of the statute on elections.

For reasons indicated1, the judgment is reversed and cause remanded for proceedings consistent with this opinion.