History
  • No items yet
midpage
Brown v. Osborne
1 Blackf. 32
Ind.
1818
Check Treatment
Scott, J.

In this case the record does not show the names of the judges who rendered the judgment complained of; nor does it appear from the transcript before us that there were any judges, except what may be conjectured from the statement that a judgment has been rendered. This is evidently a neglect of the clerk, but it is a defect for which the Court will not now reverse the proceedings.

Per Curiam.

A certiorari is awarded to the Gibson Circuit Court, directing them to send up a full and complete transcript of the record in this case (1).

It is a general rule, that, at any time pending a writ of error, whether before or after errors assigned, or after in nullo est erratum, pleaded, the Court, ex officio, may award a certiorari to inform their conscience, to affirm a judgment, but not to reverse it, or make error. Franklyn v. Reeves, Cas, temp. Hardw. 118, 119. — 2 Will. Saund. 101, s, t.

Case Details

Case Name: Brown v. Osborne
Court Name: Indiana Supreme Court
Date Published: Nov 20, 1818
Citation: 1 Blackf. 32
Court Abbreviation: Ind.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.