History
  • No items yet
midpage
Brown v. Nachtrieb
6 Colo. 517
Colo.
1883
Check Treatment
Beck, O. J.

The rulings of the district court complained of, in and by the first and second assignments of error, involve matters of sound judicial discretion with the exercise of which we must decline to interfere.

The other errors assigned are • equally without merit. The case appears to have been fairly tried, and submitted to the jury upon a correct statement of the law applicable to the facts before it.

The verdict was warranted by the pleadings and the testimony, and a careful examination of the entire record fails to disclose any legal propositions calling for our consideration. The trial appears to have been conducted in accordance with well established legal principles, and the judgment will be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Mr. Justice Helm took no part in the decision of this cause.

Case Details

Case Name: Brown v. Nachtrieb
Court Name: Supreme Court of Colorado
Date Published: Apr 15, 1883
Citation: 6 Colo. 517
Court Abbreviation: Colo.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.