History
  • No items yet
midpage
Brown v. Maxwell
135 F.2d 921
5th Cir.
1943
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

In the above numbered and entitled cause comes the appellant, by its counsel, Clyde Eastus, Esq., United States Attorney; Talbot Smith, Esq., Regional Attorney; Amos J. Coffman, Esq., Regional Enforcement Attorney; W. B. Harrell, Esq., Regional Litigation Attorney; L. L. James, Esq., Senior Enforcement Attorney, and Frank Taylor, Esq., District Enforcement Attorney, and the appellee, by his counsel, H. S. Lattimore, Esq., and file a joint stipulation to docket and remand to the trial Court for a new trial the above entitled and numbered cause.

Pursuant to said stipulation, it is ordered and adjudged by this Court that this cause be, and it is hereby, remanded to the said District Court for a new trial in accordance with the agreement and stipulation of counsel.

It is further ordered that the mandate of this court shall issue forthwith.

Case Details

Case Name: Brown v. Maxwell
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Date Published: Jun 9, 1943
Citation: 135 F.2d 921
Docket Number: No. 10694
Court Abbreviation: 5th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.