101 Wis. 661 | Wis. | 1899
There is but one serious question in this case, and that is as to the admissibility of the evidence of Adam Huber, the husband of the deceased, Ann Eliza Huber. He was produced as a witness for the plaintiff administrator, and gave testimony to the effect that he saw the securities in a bos in the bed chamber occupied by himself and the deceased on the day prior to her death, and also on the morn
It was suggested, also, that Huber’s testimony was improperly admitted because it detailed a transaction with a deceased person, and hence was inadmissible, under sec. 4069, E. S. 1878. As to this point it is sufficient to say that no objection upon this ground was made upon the trial.
Other objections and exceptions were taken to certain rulings on testimony, but they were not seriously relied on, and upon examination we have not found any of them well taken, nor of sufficient importance to discuss.
By the Court.— Judgment affirmed.