History
  • No items yet
midpage
Brown v. Hurley
177 S.E.2d 845
Ga. Ct. App.
1970
Check Treatment
Hall, Presiding Judge.

In a suit for the return of earnest money, defendant builder appeals from the denial of his motion for summary judgment.

Defendant is relying upon a clause in a contract made in November which provides for the forfeiture of the earnest money in the event of a repudiation or anticipatory breach by the buyer. Assuming without deciding that the buyer did repudiate this contract, there is a genuine issue on several material facts concerning the existence and breach of a prior, unrescinded contract betweeen these parties and the fraudulent procurement of the November contract.

The trial court did not err in denying defendant’s motion for summary judgment.

Judgment affirmed.

Been and Evans, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Brown v. Hurley
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Date Published: Sep 30, 1970
Citation: 177 S.E.2d 845
Docket Number: 45491
Court Abbreviation: Ga. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.