133 Ga. 345 | Ga. | 1909
(After stating the foregoing facts.)
Other exceptions than those dealt with above are made in these .two cases, but none of them raise questions of such novelty as would render a discussion of them profitable or interesting. No error appears save that pointed out in the first division of this opinion; and consequently the judgment of the court below is affirmed in the first of the eases as they appear stated at the head of this opinion, and reversed on the other bill of exceptions, upon the grounds of error discussed in the first division of the opinion.
Judgment in Brown v. Hooks affirmed; in Hooks v. Brown reversed.