History
  • No items yet
midpage
Brown v. Holt
174 Okla. 319
Okla.
1935
Check Treatment

The journal entry and the record show that this cause was disposed of on the 25th day of February, 1933, upon an agreed statement of facts. The defendant in error has filed motion to dismiss for the reason the appeal from the judgment of the court was not filed in this court within six months from the date of the judgment rendered. The movant cites in support thereof Durant et al. v. Nesbit, 59 Okla. 11, 157 P. 353, and related cases. This motion is not contested. A response was ordered on November 13, 1933, but none has been filed.

This court has repeatedly held that an *Page 320 appeal must be taken within six months from the date of the rendition of judgment. It appearing, therefore, that the record reasonably supports the motion to dismiss on the grounds that this proceeding was not filed until more than six months from the date of the judgment rendered, the appeal should be dismissed, and it is so ordered.

Case Details

Case Name: Brown v. Holt
Court Name: Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Date Published: Apr 9, 1935
Citation: 174 Okla. 319
Docket Number: No. 25570.
Court Abbreviation: Okla.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.