History
  • No items yet
midpage
Brown v. Hall
108 Ga. 759
Ga.
1899
Check Treatment
Little, J.

1; Ruling out an answer to a question propounded to a witness by a defendant affords to the latter no cause of complaint, when it affirmatively appears that the answer, even if admitted, would have been of no benefit to the 'defense.

2. The custom of any business or trade is binding only when it is of such universal practice as to justify the conclusion that it became, by implication, a part of the contract. Political Code, § 1, par. 4.

3. Applying to the undisputed facts of the present case the law laid down in the preceding note, the verdict rendered in the justice’s court was right, and there was no error in overruling the certiorari.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring.

Case Details

Case Name: Brown v. Hall
Court Name: Supreme Court of Georgia
Date Published: Apr 20, 1899
Citation: 108 Ga. 759
Court Abbreviation: Ga.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.