History
  • No items yet
midpage
Brown v. Einbinder
178 N.Y.S.2d 1021
N.Y. App. Div.
1958
Check Treatment

Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs to third-party plaintiff-respondent against third-party defendant-appellant. The exclusion of the prior inconsistent statement was improper but on the whole record the exclusion was not prejudicial. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Rabin, M. M. Frank, McNally and Stevens, JJ.

Case Details

Case Name: Brown v. Einbinder
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Oct 28, 1958
Citation: 178 N.Y.S.2d 1021
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.