History
  • No items yet
midpage
Brown v. Cowell
12 Johns. 384
N.Y. Sup. Ct.
1815
Check Treatment
Per Curiam,

This judgment must be affirmed. The admission of the witness to be re-examined privately, by the jury, would have been improper had not the parties consented to it. .And although the question, put by the juror, was improper, the answer was given before the justice could correct it, and he did. every thing that he could do, by telling the jury that the evidence was improper. Besides, the parties, having consented to the examination, ought not now to be permitted to object to what took place upon such examination,

Judgment affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Brown v. Cowell
Court Name: New York Supreme Court
Date Published: Oct 15, 1815
Citation: 12 Johns. 384
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. Sup. Ct.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.