History
  • No items yet
midpage
Brown v. Commissioner
1925 BTA LEXIS 2920
B.T.A.
1925
Check Treatment

Lead Opinion

OPINION.

Ivins :

The taxpayer has been misled by the fact that the units of Canadian and American currency are both designated as dollars, and that in normal times they both represent the same amount of gold, with a result that exchange is ordinarily at par. But during the war and for some time thereafter, Canadian currency was at a discount, and when the taxpayer paid to the Canadian Government $764.40 in Canadian money, he only reduced his assets to the extent of $670.13 in American money, if the payment to the Canadian Government had been in pounds sterling, in francs, or in yen, it would be perfectly obvious that the credit permissible against American taxes would be the value in United States dollars of the number of pounds, francs, or yen paid at the time of payment, and the same is equally true with respect to any other foreign currency, even though it happened to be designated “ dollar ” and have a par value identical with that of the United States dollar.

Case Details

Case Name: Brown v. Commissioner
Court Name: United States Board of Tax Appeals
Date Published: Jan 30, 1925
Citation: 1925 BTA LEXIS 2920
Docket Number: Docket No. 537.
Court Abbreviation: B.T.A.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.