History
  • No items yet
midpage
Brown v. Brown
4 Ind. 627
Ind.
1853
Check Treatment
Roache, J.

Petition for a divorce. On the hearing of the petition, it was dismissed.

The Court taxed the costs of the cause against the attorney of the plaintiff, because of the unnecessary grossness and indelicacy of the petition, and of his improper deportment in reading it.

To set aside this taxation, the cause is brought here.

To protect itself against gross violations of decency and decorum, is a necessary incidental power of a Court. They have the right to punish in this way such misconduct as is alleged in this case, on the part of an attorney. It is a power to be exercised at the sound discretion of the judge, and this Court can interfere only where it is shown to have abused its discretion.

H. F. Kiger, for the plaintiffs. G. Baker, for the defendant.

This is not shown in the present case. See Loveland v. Jones, ante, p. 184.

Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed with costs.

Case Details

Case Name: Brown v. Brown
Court Name: Indiana Supreme Court
Date Published: Dec 31, 1853
Citation: 4 Ind. 627
Court Abbreviation: Ind.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.