History
  • No items yet
midpage
Brown v. Brown
22 Mich. 299
Mich.
1871
Check Treatment
The Chief Justice

You need not proceed. There is no evidence of any demand whatever.

Kingsley now moves for costs of resisting the motion, and reads an affidavit averring constant readiness to pay the alimony on demand.

The Chief Justice — We think you are entitled to-$10 costs.

Case Details

Case Name: Brown v. Brown
Court Name: Michigan Supreme Court
Date Published: Apr 4, 1871
Citation: 22 Mich. 299
Court Abbreviation: Mich.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.