History
  • No items yet
midpage
Brown v. . Aydlett
136 S.E. 721
N.C.
1927
Check Treatment

Civil action to restrain the foreclosure of a deed of trust, it being alleged by the plaintiffs and denied by the defendants that the notes, secured by said deed of trust, have been paid, or that the balance due thereon, if any, cannot be ascertained until the controversy between P. H. Williams, receiver, and Catharine W. Brown, administratrix, as to the ownership of said notes is determined, which said controversy is now pending in the Superior Court of Pasquotank County.

From a judgment dissolving the temporary restraining order issued herein, but continuing the same until the matter could be passed upon by the Supreme Court, the plaintiffs appeal, assigning error. It appearing that a serious controversy exists between the parties, and that no harm can result from continuing the restraining order to the hearing, while a contrary ruling might work serious injury to the plaintiffs, we are of opinion that under authority of Wentz v. Land Co.,ante, 32, and cases there cited, the restraining order should have been continued to the final hearing.

Error.

Case Details

Case Name: Brown v. . Aydlett
Court Name: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date Published: Feb 23, 1927
Citation: 136 S.E. 721
Court Abbreviation: N.C.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.