History
  • No items yet
midpage
Broser v. Royal Abstract Corp.
49 Misc. 2d 882
N.Y. Sup. Ct.
1966
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

The judgment must be modified since the certificate of title liability contains a valid exculpatory clause, sufficient to insulate the defendant abstract company from liability in excess of $1,000, regardless of whether the action sounds in tort or contract.

Further, dismissal of the counterclaim was improper, since plaintiff’s law firm stands personally liable for contracts executed as agent for undisclosed principals (Goodman Prods. Corp. v. A. Lustig, Inc., 265 App. Div. 506).

The judgment should be modified by decreasing the recovery thereof to the sum of $1,000 with interest and judgment directed for the defendant on its counterclaim in the sum of $253.50 with interest, and, as modified, affirmed, with $25 costs to appellant.

Hofstadter, J. P., Hecht and Gold, JJ., concur.

Judgment modified, etc.

Case Details

Case Name: Broser v. Royal Abstract Corp.
Court Name: New York Supreme Court
Date Published: Mar 17, 1966
Citation: 49 Misc. 2d 882
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. Sup. Ct.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.