8 La. App. 188 | La. Ct. App. | 1928
This suit was brought in the name of the Broomes 'Printing Office, represented by. N. G.
A supplemental petition was voluntarily filed in which it was alleged that in the original petition “the name of the owner of the Broomes Printing Office was, through error, omitted,” and “that M. L. Broome is the sole owner of said business” and that “N. G. Broome is the manager and agent in full charge of said business.”
To this supplemental petition defendant again excepted on the ground that plaintiff was not properly before the court because no power of attorney was attached and none claimed to exist whereby N. G. Broome was authorized to act for the owner of the Broomes Printing Office, M. L. Broome.
The exceptions were overruled and a judgment rendered in plaintiff’s favor on the merits.
We are of opinion that the exceptions should have been maintained. M. L. Broome, alleged to be the owner of Broomes Printing Office is a stranger to the pleadings. No appearance on his behalf personally, or through an agent is made. A manager can not institute a suit on behalf of his employer, nor can an individual, styling himself an agent, do so without reference to, or exhibition of some authority for his action.
The judgment appealed from is reversed and it is now ordered that there be judgment in favor of defendant, dismissing plaintiff’s suit.