History
  • No items yet
midpage
Brooks v. Sullivan.
129 N.C. 190
N.C.
1901
Check Treatment

The only question is whether, when a negotiable note is transferred before maturity as collateral security for a pre-existing debt, the assignee is such holder for value that he takes free from equities of which he had no notice. The "Negotiable Instruments" statute, Acts 1899, Chap. 733, secs. 25-27, settles that such is the case now to the extent of the debt secured, but that is a change of the law, which was previously otherwise. Holderby v. Blum, 22 N.C. 51; Harris v. Horner, 21 N.C. 455, 30 Am. Dec., 182; Potts v. Blackwell, 56 N.C. 449. This case is governed by the law as it stood prior to the act of 1899.

Affirmed. *Page 191

Case Details

Case Name: Brooks v. Sullivan.
Court Name: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date Published: Nov 5, 1901
Citation: 129 N.C. 190
Court Abbreviation: N.C.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.