Brooks v. State, 349 So. 2d 794

PER CURIAM.

The judgment appealed from is affirmed, but this case is remanded for resentencing of appellant. The present sentence does not specifically set forth the period of credit time to be allowed as required by Section 921.161(1), Florida Statutes (1975); Smith v. State, 310 So.2d 770 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975). Moreover the phrase “at hard labor” in the sentence is improper. McDonald v. State, 321 So.2d 453 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975). The appellant does not have to be present at resentencing.

HOBSON, Acting C.J., and McNULTY and SCHEB, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Brooks v. State

Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida

Date Published: Sep 2, 1977

Citations: 349 So. 2d 794; 77-272

Docket Number: 77-272

Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.