17 Mich. 38 | Mich. | 1868
We are of opinion that the Circuit Judge erred in not rendering judgment for the plaintiff on the special verdict. That verdict established the bona fides of the assignment by McDonald, and the only question that could remain was, whether it was void in law by reason of the omission to select out the exempt property. This question we regard as settled by the decisions of this court in Hollister v. Loud, 2 Mich. 323, and Smith v. Mitchell, 12 Id. 180.
The judgment of the court below should be reversed, and judgment rendered for the plaintiff for six cents damages, and the costs of both courts. ' .