18 Iowa 433 | Iowa | 1865
The objection is evidently well taken, and the judgment in this particular should be corrected. It would not be a less strange than a dangerous practice to suffer a party, after dismissing his action against a defendant, and getting him out of the way, to go forward and take judgment against him.
The second objection is founded upon the alleged- insufficiency of the evidence to justify the decree entered against Louisa and Edward Clifton. This assumption
The cost of this appeal to be taxed equally to tbe plaintiff and tbe defendants, Edward and Louisa Clifton.
Modified affirmance.