midpage

Brooks v. BruynBrooks v. Bruyn

Illinois Supreme Court
Apr 15, 1864
Reporters:
Per Curiam :

When it satisfactorily appears to the court that material evidence has been inadvertently ‍‌​​‌​​‌​‌​​‌​‌​‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​‌‌‌​‌‌‌​‌‌‌​​​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌​‌​‌​​​‌​​​​‌​​​​‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌​‌​‌​​​​​​​‌​​​​​‌‌‌​​‍omitted from the bill of exceptions, and that proper diligence has been used to supply the deficiency in the record, an opportunity will be given the party to ‍‌​​‌​​‌​‌​​‌​‌​‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​‌‌‌​‌‌‌​‌‌‌​​​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌​‌​‌​​​‌​​​​‌​​​​‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌​‌​‌​​​​​​​‌​​​​​‌‌‌​​‍apply to the court below to amend the bill of exceptions, so that the whole case may be presented to this court.

But the suggestion of the counsel for the ‍‌​​‌​​‌​‌​​‌​‌​‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​‌‌‌​‌‌‌​‌‌‌​​​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌​‌​‌​​​‌​​​​‌​​​​‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌​‌​‌​​​​​​​‌​​​​​‌‌‌​​‍appellant, that to avoid a continuance for the cause mentioned, he would agree to admit the omitted deed as a part of the bill of exceptions, if put in ‍‌​​‌​​‌​‌​​‌​‌​‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​‌‌‌​‌‌‌​‌‌‌​​​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌​‌​‌​​​‌​​​​‌​​​​‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌​‌​‌​​​​​​​‌​​​​​‌‌‌​​‍the form of a stipulation to that effect, will obviate the necessity of continuing the cause for the purpose indicated. A final disposition of the motion will not ‍‌​​‌​​‌​‌​​‌​‌​‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​‌‌‌​‌‌‌​‌‌‌​​​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌​‌​‌​​​‌​​​​‌​​​​‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌​‌​‌​​​​​​​‌​​​​​‌‌‌​​‍be made until the court shall be advised whether such a stipulation will be made.

Case Details

Case Name: Brooks v. Bruyn
Court Name: Illinois Supreme Court
Date Published: Apr 15, 1864
Citation: 40 Ill. 64
Court Abbreviation: Ill.
Log In