History
  • No items yet
midpage
Brooks v. Brooks
146 Misc. 335
N.Y. App. Term.
1932
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

Final order unanimously reversed upon the law, with ten dollars costs to appellant. It is conceded that defendant’s original entry upon the premises was lawful, and, therefore, she was not an intruder or a squatter within the provisions of subdivision 4 of section 1411 of the Civil Practice Act. (6 Wait N. Y. Prac. [3d ed.] 300, and cases cited; Matter of Stockwell v. Washburn, 59 Misc. 543; Frazier v. Cropsey, 124 id. 367; Williams v. Alt, 186 App. Div. 235; affd., 226 N. Y. 283.)

All concur; present, MacCrate, Lewis and Johnston, JJ.

Case Details

Case Name: Brooks v. Brooks
Court Name: Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Date Published: Dec 15, 1932
Citation: 146 Misc. 335
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Term.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.