History
  • No items yet
midpage
Brooks Clothing of California v. Brooks Brothers
158 F.2d 798
| 9th Cir. | 1947
|
Check Treatment
158 F.2d 798 (1947)

BROOKS CLOTHING OF CALIFORNIA, Limited, Defendant-Appellant,
v.
BROOKS BROTHERS, Plaintiff-Appellee.

No. 11158.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

January 9, 1947.
Rehearing Denied February 10, 1947.

Pacht, Pelton, Warne, Ross & Bernhard, of Los Angeles, Cal. (Isaac Pacht, Clore Warne, and Bernard Reich, all of Los Angeles, Cal., and Harry D. Nims, Minturn de S. Verdi, and Wm. Mitchell Van Winkle, Jr., all of New York City, of counsel), for appellant.

Beekman Aitken, of New York City (Felix T. Smith, Eugene Prince, and Pillsbury, Madison & Sutro, all of San Francisco, Cal., of counsel), for appellee.

Before GARRECHT, MATHEWS, and HEALY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The opinion of District Judge Leon R. Yankwich (60 F. Supp. 442) correctly sets forth the salient facts, analyzes the issues, and applies the law. We adopt that opinion as our own. The judgment is affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Brooks Clothing of California v. Brooks Brothers
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Date Published: Jan 9, 1947
Citation: 158 F.2d 798
Docket Number: 11158
Court Abbreviation: 9th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.