Brockett v. State
33 Ga. App. 57
Ga. Ct. App.
1924
Check Treatment
Broyles, C. J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) In our opinion the slot machine as operated by the defendant was a gambling device, within the meaning 'of the statute. Meyer v. State, 112 Ga. 20 (37 S. E. 96, 51 L. R. A. 496, 81 Am. St. Rep. 17), and authorities cited; Alexander v. Atlanta, 13 Ga. App. 354 (79 S. E. 177).

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.