70 Iowa 399 | Iowa | 1886
I. The action was commenced before a justice of the peace to recover the value of a buggy and harness, of the
II. The causes, when consolidated, became one cause. More than $100 are involved therein, as shown by the pleadings. A certificate of the questions for decision was not necessary to authorize an appeal. One was given, however, but it must be disregarded, and the case tried here upon the record without regard to the certificate.
III. The defendant requested the circuit court to instruct the jury that the description of the mortgage is so indefinite
IV. The circuit court instructed the jury that there was no competent evidence of the judgment upon which the execu-
V. Rut the plaintiff’s counsel insists that, if erroneous, the instructions were not prejudicial, for the reason that the jury must have found that there was no fraud in the mortgage, and therefore the levy of the execution was unlawful. But, to show fraud of which defendant could take advantage in this action, it was necessary to show that there was a creditor who was defrauded. There was no evidence of any indebtedness of the mortgagor, except as it was shown by the judgment and execution under which the defendant seized the property. Unless the jury considered the judgment and execution — and they were directed not to do so-— they could not have found fraud.
Other questions discussed upon this appeal need not be considered, as they may not arise in another trial. For the error in the instructions above pointed out, the judgment of the circuit court is Revjbesed.