Broche v. State

701 So. 2d 446 | Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | 1997

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the appellant’s convictions and sentences for first degree murder, armed burglary, and armed robbery without prejudice for him to raise his challenge to his trial counsel’s closing argument before the jury on a 3.850, Fla. R.Crim. P., postconviction motion in the lower court. See Nixon v. State, 572 So.2d 1336, 1340 (Fla.1990), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 854, 112 S.Ct. 164, 116 L.Ed.2d 128 (1991).