History
  • No items yet
midpage
Broadnax v. State
100 Ga. 62
Ga.
1896
Check Treatment
Simmons, C. J.

There was no evidence at the trial showing the-age of the accused, or that on account of his tender years he was mentally incapable of committing a crime, and therefore he was presumptively capax do-li; the evidence for the State was -sufficient to warrant the conviction; and the ground of the-motion for a new trial relating to newly discovered -evidence- is. without legal merit. Judgment affb'med.

Lewis & Moore, for plaintiff in error. J. M. Terrell, attorney-general, F. If. Colley, solicitor-general, IF. M. ■Howard, and T. L. Reese, contra.

Case Details

Case Name: Broadnax v. State
Court Name: Supreme Court of Georgia
Date Published: Oct 19, 1896
Citation: 100 Ga. 62
Court Abbreviation: Ga.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.