midpage

Broadnax v. StateBroadnax v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia
Oct 19, 1896
Reporters:
, ,
Before:
Simmons
Simmons, C. J.

There was no evidence at the trial ‍​‌​​‌‌‌‌​​​​‌‌‌​‌‌​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​‌​​‌​​‌​‌‌​​‌​​‌​‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​​‌​​‌‌‌‌‌​​‌​‌​​‌‌​​​​‌​​​​‌‌​​‌​​‌​‌​‌‌‌‌‍showing the-age of the accused, or that on account of his tender years he was mentally ‍​‌​​‌‌‌‌​​​​‌‌‌​‌‌​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​‌​​‌​​‌​‌‌​​‌​​‌​‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​​‌​​‌‌‌‌‌​​‌​‌​​‌‌​​​​‌​​​​‌‌​​‌​​‌​‌​‌‌‌‌‍incapable of committing a crime, and therefore he was presumptively capax do-li; the evidence for the ‍​‌​​‌‌‌‌​​​​‌‌‌​‌‌​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​‌​​‌​​‌​‌‌​​‌​​‌​‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​​‌​​‌‌‌‌‌​​‌​‌​​‌‌​​​​‌​​​​‌‌​​‌​​‌​‌​‌‌‌‌‍State was -sufficient to warrant the conviction; and the ground of the-motion for a new ‍​‌​​‌‌‌‌​​​​‌‌‌​‌‌​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​‌​​‌​​‌​‌‌​​‌​​‌​‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​​‌​​‌‌‌‌‌​​‌​‌​​‌‌​​​​‌​​​​‌‌​​‌​​‌​‌​‌‌‌‌‍trial relating to newly discovered -evidence- is. without legal merit. Judgment affb‘med.

Lewis & Moore, for plaintiff in error. J. M. Terrell, ‍​‌​​‌‌‌‌​​​​‌‌‌​‌‌​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​‌​​‌​​‌​‌‌​​‌​​‌​‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​​‌​​‌‌‌‌‌​​‌​‌​​‌‌​​​​‌​​​​‌‌​​‌​​‌​‌​‌‌‌‌‍attorney-general, F. If. Colley, solicitor-general, IF. M. ■Howard, and T. L. Reese, contra.

Case Details

Case Name: Broadnax v. State
Court Name: Supreme Court of Georgia
Date Published: Oct 19, 1896
Citations: 100 Ga. 62; 25 S.E. 844; 1896 Ga. LEXIS 538
Court Abbreviation: Ga.
Log In