History
  • No items yet
midpage
Broaddus v. Theurer
92 Fla. 1107
Fla.
1926
Check Treatment

In this case the Chief Justice, Mr. Justice TERRELL and Mr. Justice BUFORD are of the opinion that the decree entered by the trial court from which the appeal is taken should be reversed, while Mr. Justice WHITFIELD, Mr. Justice STRUM and Mr. Justice BROWN are of the opinion that said decree should be affirmed; and, there being no prospect of a change of judicial opinion, the decree should be affirmed on the authority of State ex rel. Hampton v. McClung, 47 Fla. 224,37 South. Rep. 51; Pensacola Electric Co. v. Humphreys, 61 Fla. 389,54 South. Rep. 452; Quigg, Chief of Police, v. Radel, 86 Fla. 197,97 South. Rep. 380, and State ex rel. Amos, v. Hamwey, 87 Fla. 55,100 South. Rep. 796; Yarnell v. Gregory, 88 Fla. 91.

An order will be entered affirming the decree herein.

All concur.

*Page 1108

Case Details

Case Name: Broaddus v. Theurer
Court Name: Supreme Court of Florida
Date Published: Dec 17, 1926
Citation: 92 Fla. 1107
Court Abbreviation: Fla.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.