81 Pa. Super. 456 | Pa. Super. Ct. | 1923
Argued April 18, 1923. This case differs from that of Anna C. Brinton against the same defendant, opinion filed this day, [see preceding case], in that there was no contractual relation between this plaintiff and the common defendant. The negligence here alleged is purely tortious and does not grow out of any contractual obligation resting upon the defendant in behalf of the plaintiff. The case, therefore, falls within the general rule of the nonliability of a school district, or other governmental agency, for the negligence of its officers and employees, discussed at some length in the Anna C. Brinton Case, supra, and requires us to sustain the assignments of error.
The case on its facts is almost on all fours with the very late case of Wildoner v. Luzerne County Central Poor District,
The judgment is reversed and is now entered for the defendant.