Briggs v. United Shoe Machinery Corp.114 A. 538 N.J.1920Check Treatment Per Curiam. The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Buchanan. For affirmance—The Ci-iiee-Justice, Swayze, Trenoi-iard, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, White, Herpentieimer, Ackerson—10. For reversal—None.
