History
  • No items yet
midpage
Briggs v. Kansas
242 U.S. 615
SCOTUS
1916
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) Dreyer v. Illinois, 187 U. S. 71, 83-84; Prentis v. Atlantic Coast Line, 211 U. S. 210, 225; (2) Baldwin v. Kansas, 129 U. S. 52; *616Spies v. Illinois, 123 U. S. 131; Jacobi v. Alabama, 187 U. S. 133; (3) Equitable Life Assurance Society v. Brown, 187 U. S. 308, 311; Consolidated Turnpike v. Norfolk &c. Ry. Co., 228 U. S. 596, 600; Manhattan Life Insurance Co. v. Cohen, 234 U. S. 123, 137; (4) Moore v. Missouri, 159 U. S. 673; McDonald v. Massachusetts, 180 U. S. 311; Graham v. West Virginia, 224 U. S. 616; Carlesi v. New York, 233 U. S. 51. Mr. A. M. Harvey for the plaintiff in error. Mr. James P. Coleman for the defendant in error.

Case Details

Case Name: Briggs v. Kansas
Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States
Date Published: Dec 4, 1916
Citation: 242 U.S. 615
Docket Number: No. 113
Court Abbreviation: SCOTUS
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.