History
  • No items yet
midpage
Briggs v. Kansas
242 U.S. 615
SCOTUS
1916
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction ‍‌‌‌‌‌​​‌​‌‌​​‌‌‌‌‌‌​​​​​‌​​‌‌‌‌‌​​​‌‌‌‌‌​​​​‌​​​‍upon the authority of (1) Dreyer v. Illinois, 187 U. S. 71, 83-84; Prentis v. Atlantic Coast Line, 211 U. S. 210, 225; (2) Baldwin v. Kansas, 129 U. S. 52; *616Spies v. Illinois, 123 U. S. 131; Jacobi v. Alabama, 187 U. S. 133; (3) Equitable Life Assurance Society v. Brown, 187 U. S. 308, 311; Consolidated Turnpike v. Norfolk &c. Ry. Co., 228 U. S. 596, 600; Manhattan Life Insurance Co. v. Cohen, 234 U. S. 123, 137; (4) Moore v. Missouri, 159 U. S. 673; McDonald v. Massachusetts, 180 U. S. 311; Graham v. West Virginia, 224 U. S. 616; Carlesi v. New York, 233 U. S. 51. Mr. A. M. Harvey for the plaintiff in error. Mr. James P. Coleman for the defendant in error.

Case Details

Case Name: Briggs v. Kansas
Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States
Date Published: Dec 4, 1916
Citation: 242 U.S. 615
Docket Number: No. 113
Court Abbreviation: SCOTUS
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.