History
  • No items yet
midpage
Brienza v. Unity Amusement Corp.
248 A.D. 586
N.Y. App. Div.
1936
Check Treatment

Order denying on condition defendant’s motion to dismiss the action for failure to prosecute reversed on the law, without costs, and motion granted, without costs. No affidavit of plaintiff was submitted on the motion. There is not an adequate showing of merits, nor does the nature or extent of plaintiff’s injuries appear. In view of the statement in plaintiff’s attorney’s affidavit as to plaintiff’s impoverished condition, he should have applied to sue as a poor person. In our opinion it was an improper exercise of discretion to deny the motion. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Adel, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Brienza v. Unity Amusement Corp.
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: May 15, 1936
Citation: 248 A.D. 586
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.