History
  • No items yet
midpage
412 S.W.3d 400
Mo. Ct. App.
2013

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Adam Bridgewater appeals from the motion court’s denial of his Rule 24.035 motion. Bridgewater argues that the motion court erred because he received ineffective assistance of counsel in that his trial counsel failed to explain that by entering an open plea, Bridgewater faced the full range of punishment, including consecutive life sentences. Bridgewater claims that if his trial counsel would have informed him of the possibility of consecutive life sentences, he would not have pleaded guilty. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Case Details

Case Name: Bridgewater v. State
Court Name: Missouri Court of Appeals
Date Published: Sep 10, 2013
Citations: 412 S.W.3d 400; 2013 WL 4807079; 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 1037; No. WD 75421
Docket Number: No. WD 75421
Court Abbreviation: Mo. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In
    Bridgewater v. State, 412 S.W.3d 400