History
  • No items yet
midpage
Bridges v. State
37 Ark. 224
Ark.
1881
Check Treatment
' Harrison, J.

But one offense was charged in the in•dictment. It was alleged to have been committed in two modes, in distinct counts, the first charging it to have been by selling, on Sunday, the fourteenth day of March, 1880, a pint of whisky; the second, by selling, on the same day, a pint of alcohol. See Howard v. The State, 34 Ark., 433.

The indictment was under Sec. 1618 of Gantt’s Digest, which is as follows :

“Every person who shall oil Sunday keep open any store, or retail any goods, wares or merchandise, or keep open any dram-shop or grocery, or sell or retail any spirits or wine, shall, on conviction thereof, be fined in any sum, not less than ten dollars, nor more than twenty.”

The evidence was clearly sufficient to prove the sale of a pint of alcohol on a Sunday, in the county, within twelve months before the finding of the indictment.

Alcohol is embraced in any one of the terms, goods, wares •or merchandise. To sell by small parcels or quantities, and not in the gross, is to retail.

The judgment is affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Bridges v. State
Court Name: Supreme Court of Arkansas
Date Published: May 15, 1881
Citation: 37 Ark. 224
Court Abbreviation: Ark.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.