midpage

Bridgemarket Associates v. City of New YorkBridgemarket Associates v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Feb 9, 1993
Versions:190 A.D.2d 561
593 N.Y.S.2d 1016
1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1039

— Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Eugene L. Nardelli, J.), entered October 9, 1991, which denied defendants’ motion for a stay of this action pending exhaustion of appellate remedies in Sutton Area Community v City of New York (190 AD2d 562 [decided herewith]), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

These two actions, while arising from the same set of *562transactions, do not have complete identity of parties and causes of action, and thus a stay under CPLR 2201 is not warranted (Hope’s Windows v Albro Metal Prods. Corp., 93 AD2d 711, 712, appeal dismissed 59 NY2d 968). Concur— Carro, J. P., Milonas, Ellerin and Asch, JJ.

Case Details

Case Name: Bridgemarket Associates v. City of New York
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Feb 9, 1993
Citations: 190 A.D.2d 561; 593 N.Y.S.2d 1016; 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1039
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
Log In