Brickell v. Bass

Oct 15, 1794
Reporters:

Note. — As to what circumstances ‍‌​‌​‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌​​​​‌‌‌‌​​​‌‌​​​​‌‌‌​​‌‌​​‌‌​​​​‌​‌‌‌​‌​‌‌​​‌​‌​​‌‌​​‌‌​‌​‌​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​​​​‌‌​‌‌​​‌​‌​‍will be deemed sufficient to entitle a party to a certiorari see Chambers v. Smith, ‍‌​‌​‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌​​​​‌‌‌‌​​​‌‌​​​​‌‌‌​​‌‌​​‌‌​​​​‌​‌‌‌​‌​‌‌​​‌​‌​​‌‌​​‌‌​‌​‌​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​​​​‌‌​‌‌​​‌​‌​‍post 366, Robertson v. Stowe, post 402, McMillan v. Smith & Walker, 2 Car. Law Rep. 77, Dyer v. Rich, 2 Car Law ‍‌​‌​‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌​​​​‌‌‌‌​​​‌‌​​​​‌‌‌​​‌‌​​‌‌​​​​‌​‌‌‌​‌​‌‌​​‌​‌​​‌‌​​‌‌​‌​‌​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​​​​‌‌​‌‌​​‌​‌​‍Rep. 610, Steele v. Harris, ibid. 636, Hood v. Orr, N. C. Term Rep. 151, Davis v. Marshall & Russell, 2 Hawks, 59, Mera v. Scales & McCain, ibid. 364. zThe propriety ‍‌​‌​‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌​​​​‌‌‌‌​​​‌‌​​​​‌‌‌​​‌‌​​‌‌​​​​‌​‌‌‌​‌​‌‌​​‌​‌​​‌‌​​‌‌​‌​‌​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​​​​‌‌​‌‌​​‌​‌​‍of the other part of the decision was denied by ‍‌​‌​‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌​​​​‌‌‌‌​​​‌‌​​​​‌‌‌​​‌‌​​‌‌​​​​‌​‌‌‌​‌​‌‌​​‌​‌​​‌‌​​‌‌​‌​‌​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​​​​‌‌​‌‌​​‌​‌​‍Haywood Judge, in an anonymous case, post 171.