History
  • No items yet
midpage
Brewer v. State
12 Tex. 248
Tex.
1854
Check Treatment
Wheeler, J.

It is reasonable to suppose that the Judge who presided at the trial, was quite as competent to decide whether the jury were sworn, as the persons whose testimony was proposed touching that question. We must presume that the fact, that the jury were sworn, was within the knowledge of the presiding Judge; and he might well refuse to hear the testimony of witnesses , offered to contradict the evidence of his senses. The judgment is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Brewer v. State
Court Name: Texas Supreme Court
Date Published: Jul 1, 1854
Citation: 12 Tex. 248
Court Abbreviation: Tex.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.