| N.Y. App. Term. | Dec 21, 1928

Per Curiam.

Wall v. Hess (232 N.Y. 472" court="NY" date_filed="1922-02-03" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/wall-v--hess-3583164?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="3583164">232 N. Y. 472) and subsequent authorities relied upon by respondent are inapplicable. A landlord *424is not privileged to end the tenant’s term by the exercise of an option and at the same time charge him with obligations consistent only with the continuance of the term.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs.

All concur; present, Bijur, Levy and Crain, JJ.

© 2024 Midpage AI does not provide legal advice. By using midpage, you consent to our Terms and Conditions.