86 So. 2d 131 | La. Ct. App. | 1956
Gaston L. Breaux has taken his appeal from the judgment rendered in his favor for $4,663.39 in his suit for $42,340.49 for personal injuries, medical expenses and loss of wages against the same defendants im-pleaded in the case of Ryan v. All State Insurance Co., Chicago, Illinois, La.App., 86 So.2d 126, with which Breaux’ suit was consolidated. For the reasons stated in the opinion and decree handed down by us this day in Harold Hyan’s suit, Breaux is .entitled to a recovery for his damages against Leslie Evans and Allstate Insurance Company, in solido.
When the Bowers automobile was turned over as a result of the impact of the collision, Breaux’ left arm was pinned under the car. He was conveyed by am
The trial judge thought that Breaux had been damaged to the extent of $5,000 for the personal injuries, pain and .suffering; he found that the sizeable medical bills amounting to $602.49 had been proven and that Breaux’ loss of salary at the Foothill Electric, Company, where he is a foreman, was $117.90 per week for eleven weeks or $1,296.90, and that he also lost his pay at Delgado Trades School, where he is an instructor, which amounts to $264 for the eleven-week period of incapacity resulting from the injuries. We approve the amounts found to. be due for each of the particular items, but we believe that the sum of $1,000 should be added thereto for the acromion clavicular or separation of the left shoulder which is apparently a permanent condition. All of the above amounts total the sum of $8,163.39 and this should be the amount of the judgment.
For the reasons assigned, that portion of the judgment appealed from which dismisses plaintiff’s suit as against Allstate Insurance Company. be and the same is hereby annulled and avoided, and it is now ordered, adjudged and decreed that the judgment be amended so as to run against Leslie Evans and Allstate Insurance Company, jointly and in solido, for the full sum of '$8,163.39, and as thus amended and in all other respects'the. judgment is affirmed; said appellees are cast for the costs of this appeal. . ■ ■
Reversed in part; amended and affirmed in part.