1 Conn. 498 | Conn. | 1816
The agreement respecting the time of meeting for a hearing by the referees, was no part of the submission, and, as such, cannot be noticed by the court ; but if it was made use of to practice a fraud, and while the plain
When a submission is made by rule of court, it is irrevocable ; for the object is to place the parties in a situation that either may compel the other to make a final settlement of the dispute. If no provision is made to the contrary, it is incidental to the power of referees or arbitrators to appoint the time and place of trial, and to proceed therein according to their discretion. They may adjourn from time to time, as the case may require. It is the duty of the parties to appear before them, and proceed to trial; and if either should refuse, it then results from the nature of the submission, that the referees may proceed to an ex parte hearing ; for otherwise either party might defeat the trial, and indirectly revoke the submission. In cases where the plaintiff only claims damages, if the defendant should refuse to appear, the referees might examine the witnesses for the plaintiff, and ascertain and award the sum due. If the plaintiff refuses to appear, there need be no enquiry ; for on failure of proof, the referees must award in favour of the defendant. But if there are mutual claims, they may make proper enquiries to ascertain the claims, and award accordingly. In this way, the parties may be compelled to a final settlement of the controversy submitted. It is true, where a plaintiff is before a court of law, he can withdraw his suit at pleasure, and commence a new action ; but by his submission by rule of court, he has waived this privilege, and has given an irrevocable power to the referees to decide the question. Such construction ought to be given to the statute as will enable courts to carry into effect this voluntary agreement of the parties. By giving the referees the
In order, then, to give full effect to the statute authorising submissions by rule of court, it is to be construed to give the arbitrators the power to proceed to an ex parte hearing and trial, in all cases where either party refuses to appear upon due notice being given ; and there can be no more impropriety in subjecting the plaintiff upon an ex parte trial before arbitrators, that there is a defendant upon default of appearance in court.
I am of opinion that the judgment of the superior court it erroneous, and that it be reversed.
In this opinion the other Judges concurred.
Judgment reversed.