History
  • No items yet
midpage
Braxton v. State
117 Ga. 703
Ga.
1903
Check Treatment
Fish, J.

1. The deceitful means and artful practice by -which an indictment charges the prosecutor was defrauded and cheated need not be the sole inducement which caused him to part with his property. Proof that they were relied upon and constituted in part such inducement will authorize a conviction, though there may have been other contributing inducements. 2 Clark & Marshall, Law of Crimes, 841, and cases cited.

2. There was no error in admitting testimony, and the evidence authorized the verdict. Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. O. N. Sellers, for plaintiff in error. William Brunson, solicitor-general contra.

Case Details

Case Name: Braxton v. State
Court Name: Supreme Court of Georgia
Date Published: Jun 25, 1903
Citation: 117 Ga. 703
Court Abbreviation: Ga.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.