Bravo v. New York City Housing AuthorityBravo v. New York City Housing Authority
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant New York City Housing Authority appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Schneier, J.), dated August 11, 1997, which, upon renewal and reargument, denied its motion pursuant to CPLR 3012 (b) to dismiss the action insofar as assertéd against it for failure to serve a complaint.
Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law and as an exercise of discretion, with costs, the appellant’s motion is granted, the complaint is dismissed insofar as asserted against it, and the action against the remaining defendants is severed.
The Supreme Court improvidently exercised its discretion in denying the appellant’s motion to dismiss the action based upon the plaintiffs failure to serve a complaint (see, CPLR 3012 [b]). In order to successfully oppose the appellant’s motion, the plaintiff was required to demonstrate a meritorious cause of action and a reasonable excuse for the delay (see, Culley v Morrison,