History
  • No items yet
midpage
BRANIGIN Et Al. v. DUDDLESTON Et Al.
1968 U.S. LEXIS 1646
| SCOTUS | 1968
|
Check Treatment

391 U.S. 364

88 S. Ct. 1666

20 L. Ed. 2d 641

Roger D. BRANIGIN et al.
v.
Dorothy S. DUDDLESTON et al.

No. 1252.

Joseph W. SUMMERS

v.

Dorothy S. DUDDLESTON et al.

No. 1263.

Supreme Court of the United States

October Term, 1967.

October Term, 1967.

May 20, 1968

John J. Dillon, Atty. Gen. of Indiana, and Charles S. White, for appellants Roger D. Branigin and others.

Marshall F. Kizer, for appellant Joseph W. Summers.

Leslie Duvall and William H. Sparrenberger, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

1

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

2

Mr. Justice HARLAN, for reasons contained in his memorandum of March 4, 1968 (390 U.S. 932, 88 S. Ct. 1016, 19 L. Ed. 2d 1124, sub nom. Branigin v. Grills), in which he acquiesced in the denial of stays of enforcement of the District Court's judgment, also acquiesces in the Court's affirmance of that judgment.

Case Details

Case Name: BRANIGIN Et Al. v. DUDDLESTON Et Al.
Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States
Date Published: Oct 14, 1968
Citation: 1968 U.S. LEXIS 1646
Docket Number: 1252
Court Abbreviation: SCOTUS
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.