History
  • No items yet
midpage
Branick v. DOWNEY SAVINGS & LOAN
110 P.3d 1217
| Cal. | 2005
|
Check Treatment
28 Cal. Rptr. 3d 2 (2005)
110 P.3d 1217

BRANICK
v.
DOWNEY SAVINGS & LOAN.

No. S132433.

Supreme Court of California.

April 27, 2005.

Petition for review granted; issues limited

Petition for review GRANTED.

The issue to be briefed and argued is limited to the following: If the standing limitations of Proposition 64 apply to actions under the Unfair Competition Law that were pending on November 3, 2004, may a plaintiff amend his or her complaint to substitute in or add a party that satisfies standing requirements of Business and Professions Code section 17204, as amended, and does such an amended complaint relate back to the initial complaint for statute of limitations purposes?

GEORGE, C.J., KENNARD, BAXTER, WERDEGAR, CHIN, BROWN, and MORENO, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Branick v. DOWNEY SAVINGS & LOAN
Court Name: California Supreme Court
Date Published: Apr 27, 2005
Citation: 110 P.3d 1217
Docket Number: S132433
Court Abbreviation: Cal.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.