History
  • No items yet
midpage
Brandt v. Brandt
151 N.Y.S. 1106
N.Y. App. Div.
1915
Check Treatment

Judgment affirmed, with costs. The failure of appellant to file exceptions to the conclusions of law is fatal to the maintenance of this appeal. (People v. Journal Co., 213 N. Y. 1.) But assuming that the witnesses were competent to testify, upon the merits the judgment was right. The character of the evidence in support of plaintiff’s claim is not that clear and convincing proof from disinterested witnesses which is necessary to establish against the executors of a deceased person such a contract as plaintiff seeks to enforce in this action. Jenks, P. J., Burr, Thomas, Rich and Putnam, JJ., concurred.

Case Details

Case Name: Brandt v. Brandt
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Jan 15, 1915
Citation: 151 N.Y.S. 1106
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.