Reads, J.

The statutes prescribes that the clerks of Courts, sheriffs and other officers shall receive certain specified fees for - *63 services, and that they shall receive “ no extra allowance or other compensation whatsoever, unless the same shall be expressly required by some statute.” C. C. P., sec. 555; Bat. Rev., chap. 105.

The language is broad, but still it may have been intended to apply to the services specified and not to extra services for which no fees are specified. And this is made the more probable by reference to the statutes and the practice under the former system. Our former statute, Eev. Code, ch. 102, prescribed the fees which officers should receive, “ and no other.” And yet the County Courts were in the habit of making to the clerks and sheriffs extra allowances for extra services. But this was understood to be a matter of county police, regulated by the County Courts, and was never exercised by the Superior Courts as incident to their powers.

So that it would seem that if our statutes do not now forbid any extra allowance, yet if any allowance be made it cannot be by a Judge of the Superior Court, but must be by the Board of County Commissioners, which, in matters of county police, take the place of the old County Courts.

Our conclusion is, that his Honor had no power to make the order of extra allowance to the plaintiff, or any of the subsequent orders against the defendants to pay the same, and that they are not in contempt for refusing to obey.

There is error. This will be certified to the end that the orders may be vacated and the defendants go without day.

Pek Cükiam. Ordered accordingly.