22 N.Y. 469 | NY | 1860
The act chartering the village of Ilion creates a police justice, and gives to him, within the village, the jurisdiction of a justice of the peace of the town of German Flats. (Laws of 1854, ch. 127.) The cause of action upon which this suit was brought, arose in another town within the county of Herkimer; but it was of a transitory nature in justices' courts, and could be tried before any justice of the peace, provided the parties were regularly before him. (Code, § 53, sub. 2; 2 R.S., 225, § 2, sub. 2; Graves v. McKeon, 2 Denio, 639.) For the same reason, and under the same condition, the police justice of Ilion could take cognizance of the case. He could not hold his court, and probably could not send his summons, without the corporate limits of the village. But the parties could voluntarily appear before him and join issue in any controversy arising elsewhere, but not local in its character, provided the matter were such that a justice of the peace could try it. So, if the parties resided or came within the village, he could regularly issue his summons at the suit of either against the other, and thus acquire jurisdiction of such a controversy. It is to be assumed that the procedure in this case was according to one or the other of these modes, because nothing to the contrary appears. The record shows that the defendant answered *471 the complaint, and it does not disclose that he made any objection to the jurisdiction of his person. Indeed, by tendering an issue upon the title to the lands on which the alleged trespass was committed, he waived all objections of that nature. (2 Hill, 657; 5 id., 264, 271.)
It is claimed, however, that the Constitution does not permit such an office to be created with such a jurisdiction. But the question was, in effect, determined otherwise in the case ofSill v. The Village of Corning (
It is urged that the charter of the village of Ilion attempts to create an additional justice of the peace for the town of German Flats, to be chosen by only a portion of the electors of that town. If this were true, the statute would doubtless be unconstitutional. (Const., art. VI, § 17.) But such, we think, was not the intention, nor is it the result, of the enactment in question. The difference between the office of police justice, as constituted by this statute, and that of a justice of the peace, is sufficiently marked by the absence, in the former, of a variety of powers and duties which appertain to the latter, and still more by the territorial restriction which confines the jurisdiction of the police magistrate to the limits of the village.
The judgment of the Supreme Court must be reversed, and that of the County Court affirmed.
All the judges concurring,
Ordered accordingly. *472