The evidence is conflicting as to whether the plaintiff violated his instructions or not. According to the testimony of some of the witnesses, and, perhaps, the weight of evidence, he did. But other witnesses testified that his instructions were to do with the beeves as he thought best. The evidence leaves no doubt that he had such a discretion in a certain event. It does not clearly and certainly appear that what he did was not for the best; or what he honestly thought, or had reason to think, was the best he could do for his employers under the circumstances. It was for the jury to weigh the evidence, and decide whether he had violated his instruc
Judgment affirmed.